some
Trustee Election
These are the original issues in this subcategory
  • SPORTS GAMBLING
  • TITLE IX
  • STADIUM SUBSIDIES
Winning Issue » STADIUM SUBSIDIES


Public funds are often used to lure pro sports teams to a city or to prevent one from relocating. These enticements include building or renovating stadiums and making improvements to surrounding infrastructure. Team owners often threaten to relocate their teams in order to secure taxpayer assistance for improvements to stadiums and arenas. Between 2000 and 2022, about 121 stadiums were either built or renovated at an average cost of $330 million. Since the early 1960s, 91 sports stadiums have been built or replaced with public funding, and 22 of them were fully paid for with taxpayer funds. Sometimes, local officials seize land through eminent domain and donate it to sports franchises. Some cities pay their team's property taxes as well as the costs of street construction, security, traffic control and parking. Studies have shown the public receives few, if any, economic benefit from the construction of new stadiums. The average cost to replace a sports stadium is upwards of $1 billion to over $3 billion. Critics say taxpayer funds should not be used on building stadiums for wealthy sports franchises when communities have more important needs.

Pending Legislation: H.R.2434 - No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act of 2025
Sponsor: Rep. Glen Grothman (WI)
Status: House Committee on Ways and Means
Chair: Rep. Jason Smith (MO)



Options


  • I oppose reforming current stadium subsidy policy and wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Speaker Mike Johnson (LA).
  • I support eliminating federal tax subsidies for professional sports stadiums by ending the tax-exempt status of municipal bonds used for their construction by:

    1.) Defining a professional stadium bond as any bond whose proceeds are used to finance a facility (stadium or arena) used for professional sports exhibitions, games, or training for at least five days in a calendar year.

    2.) Amending the Internal Revenue Code to define bonds for professional sports facilities as taxable, meaning their interest would no longer be exempt from federal tax.

    3.) Preventing teams from benefiting from these subsidies, which have cost taxpayers billions of dollars, and would apply to bonds issued after the bill's enactment.

    And wish to donate resources to the campaign committee of Rep. Jason Smith (MO) and/or to an advocate group currently working with this issue.


Winning Option
There has been $ 0.00 pledged in support of this issue


Trustee Candidates
DUAL TRUSTEE
To participate in the Trustee Election you must first pledge support to this issue.

Representative Jason Smith
If elected as a trustee, the campaign committee of Rep. Jason Smith (MO) will be unconditionally awarded the funds pledged to this issue along with a letter requesting him to favorably consider passing H.R.2434 - No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act of 2025.



Cato Institute
If elected as a trustee, CATO Institute will be awarded the funds pledged to this issue along with a letter requesting these funds be used to advocate against public funding of sports stadiums.

About; The Cato Institute is a public policy research organization — a think tank — dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace. Its scholars and analysts conduct independent, nonpartisan research on a wide range of policy issues. Using all means possible — from blogs, Web features, informative direct mail, op-eds and TV appearances, to conferences, research reports, speaking engagements, and books — Cato works vigorously to present citizens with incisive and understandable analysis.


Click here if you wish to make a pledge.
Trustee Election - Opening Date
October 27, 2025
Trustee Election - Closing Date
November 3, 2025